The first three ways are generally considered to be cosmological arguments. For example, while he would allow that 'in all creatures there is found the trace of the Trinity', yet 'a trace shows that someone has passed by but not who it is.' Categorization as special revelation), quite the reverse. as general revelation) would necessarily provide any of the vital details revealed in Christ and through the church (i.e. However, Aquinas did not hold that what could be demonstrated philosophically (i.e. On the other hand, he also rejected the idea that God's existence cannot be demonstrated: although it is impossible to give a so-called propter quid demonstration, going from the causes to the effects nevertheless the proposition God exists can be 'demonstrated' from God's effects, which are more known to us, through a so-called quia demonstration. Background Need for demonstration of the existence of God Īquinas did not think the finite human mind could know what God is directly, therefore God's existence is not self-evident to us, although it is self-evident in itself.

the argument from final cause or ends (' teleological argument').Īquinas expands the first of these – God as the 'unmoved mover' – in his Summa Contra Gentiles.The Quinque viæ ( Latin for ' Five Ways') (sometimes called 'five proofs') are five logical arguments for the existence of God summarized by the 13th-century Catholic philosopher and theologian Thomas Aquinas in his book Summa Theologica.

Aquinas summa theologica